Monday, November 5, 2012

THE RACE OF THE RACE!

The republicans are racists, conservatives are racists, the tea party Is a hate filled group, all the republicans despise minorities, and so on and on. 
If you ever watched MSNBC for more than an hour, I bet you that you've stumbled upon those kind of remarks. But these stupidity filled ideas are not exclusively assigned to the MSNBC pundits, you can find those ideas on a few other places in the main stream media. 
So what to do with this? Can this claim possibly be true? And if it isn't true, than why do these pundits keep on repeating this claim over and over again? 
I'll try to clear up this issue a bit. the claims, the rebuttals, the videos, everything will come up as we try to maze our way past this race thingy. So here we go. 
There's a very famous -and very old- proverb that will help us out overhere. 
When you see a person who is always busy calling out other people's failures, you should know that this person definitely encompasses within him all of these failures. And because he's the guy who has all these failures inside him, therefore he's the one who will find fault with everyone else. 
Yes, I mean you chris Matthews. Rachel maddow. Toure. And a few more names that I just don't remember on the moment. YOU ARE RACISTS!!
But lets try to examine a few of their claims, and we'll see wether their claims are correct or it's just a bunch of stuff. 
Chris Matthews goes on a rant saying that all the attacks from the GOP against Barack Obama are racist. He rants against Sarah palin saying that when she attacked Obama, saying that he covered up the Benghazi attacks, she was a racist. You'll definitely ask what did chris Matthews see in palins words to label her "racist"? Well, apperantely he found that Sarah palin said "that obamas shuck and jive ends with Benghazi lies". 
So I've got two questions. Number one. Where was chris Matthews when NY gov. Andrew cuomo or when WH press secretary jay carney said these exact same words? 
 Dont hold your breath because The answer is... he was nowhere to be found. But the most important question is, what happened when Matthews himself used these words, isn't he considered a racist??  
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/scott-whitlock/2012/10/24/chris-matthews-who-used-phrase-shuck-and-jive-now-calls-sarah-palin-
 Yup. Chris Matthews goes on a rant attacking Sarah palin for being a racist by saying "shuck and jive", but when Matthews himself used those exact same words in 2010 then apperantely he isn't a racist. Why? Ask the racist of chief chris Matthews. 
I'll bring you another example from racist Matthews. 
3 days ago Barack Obama made his closing arguments at a campaign rally. While he was attacking mitt Romney,the crowd started booing. Obama evoked his old "don't boo, vote" meme. But then he added something new. He said "voting is the best revenge". REVENGE? The president of the United States suggests to people to go out and vote for revenge? That's quite a bit scary.  
But try to use your imagination a little. What would've happened if mitt Romney would've uttered those words? Don't you think that the whole media would've been up in arms against him? Well, to your luck you won't have to use your imagination too much. Apperantely chris Matthews didn't know that Obama first uttered this revenge line, and so he started attacking... Romney for stoking ethnic fears by running with the revenge line!! Yup, forget the fact that Obama was the one who tried to stoke hatred in his people by urging them to REVENGE. Blame mitt Romney -for rightfully attacking a guy who says to his supporters to vote for revenge- that by saying that Obama wasn't supposed to use such hateful words, he try's to stoke ethnic fears in the American people.  hews-unaware-revenge-was-obamas-line-insists-romney-stoking-
 You can see for yourself.  If when Romney attacks Obama for using scare tactics, he's being called a racist; imagine what would've happened if Romney would've said voting is the best revenge? You know the answer. Whenever a republican will utter anything out of his mouth, even if its a rebuttal of racist comments he'll be a racist. And if a democrat will use real racial stuff, you won't hear a word.

Now you tell me if chris Matthews isn't a racist.
But it doesn't finish with him. I'll bring u a few more examples of utter rubbish racism accusations.
Laurence odonnell accused senate minority leader Mitch McConnell with racism, for saying that...
Actually I listened to that video quite a few times and I wasn't able to find anything remotely similar to racism in his remarks.
I'll bring you the video so that you'll be able to check it out for yourselves, but I have no doubt in my mind that nobody will find anything close to racism there.
So than why does odonnell throw such hateful allegations on him? If you've read my simple proverb with which I started the article, you'll notice that everything is perfect. Mitch McConnell isn't the racist, Laurence odonnell is!! http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/315677/lawrence-odonnell-and-tiger-woods-lifestyle-eliana-johnson http://reason.com/blog/2012/08/30/msnbcs-lawrence-odonnell-mocking-obamas
It gets crazier by the minute.
There's a reporter on mediaite named tommy Christopher. I'd suggest for him to go work at MSNBC. I checked out his articles on mediaite and I found that he's a big hate monger, so I think that he'll very much enjoy all his racists friends on that trashy network.
I try to keep my blog very clean so I won't bring all of his hate filled articles here, I'll just post an article on which I just stumbled upon and you'll see everything very clearly.
After the first debate in Denver where Romney gave a knock out performance, all the pundits and analysts expected that Obama will come back by the second debate as very forceful -and that's what happened. One of those people were former South Carolina governor mark Sanford. He went on Fox News and predicted that Obama will throw a lot of spears by the second debate. 
Question: did anyone find any racism so far? I know you all answer no.  But apparently this tommy Christopher did find.
Hmmmm... What can possibly be racism here? The answer goes somewhat like this. This guy said that Obama will throw spears... And spearchucker is a racial slur!!
And this I call genius. Sanford never said spearchucker, he said spare, which is a totally normal word. But since its a cousin to the spearchucker word, he definitely wanted to use that word and therefore he's accused of racism!!
Here's the dictionary definition for both words
Noun:
A weapon with a long shaft and a pointed tip, typically of metal, used for thrusting or throwing.
Verb:
Pierce or strike with a spear or other pointed object: "she speared a French fry with her fork".

Definition for spearchucker:

Web definitions:
A Black (African or African-American) person.
en.wiktionary.org/wiki/spearchucker 
And here's the link 
And here's the link http://www.mediaite.com/tv/fear-chucker-fox-contributor-mark-sanford-says-obama-to-throw-a-lot-of-spears-at-debate/ 
Insane? No. Much more than that! Racism with lunacy mixed up!!! 

Isn't a guy who says on live TV that if mitt Romney will win Florida and Virginia then the south will be the confederacy, a BIG racist? Oh I forgot. Andrew Sullivan is a liberal, and there is no racists by the liberals. Got it!!
Isn't Americas former president bill Clinton a racist? Look what he said in 2008 on Obama when he was dead locked in a primary fight with Hillary Clinton:
NEW YORKER:  Bill Clinton on Obama: 'A Few Years Ago, This Guy Would Have Been Carrying Our Bags'... 
Hey chris Matthews where are you? I don't see you wasting your time on this? Oh, I forgot. Clinton is a democrat and democrats aren't racists, only republicans are racists!! 
Lemme ask a general question on racism. Why when a black person says something racist on white people, he isn't called out as racist? 
Why when 60% of whites will vote for mitt Romney, it is because a lot of them are racists; but when NINETY FIVE% of blacks are voting for Obama it has nothing to do with racism?? 
And another question. As known, blacks are mostly quite conservative on marriage and other social issues and they oppose gay marriage. 
So how is it possible that when PPP polls polled blacks after Obama announced his support of gay marriage, the results showed that a majority of blacks support it. a dramatic reversal from a few weeks before when most blacks said they were against it. http://www.prop8trialtracker.com/2012/05/24/breaking-new-ppp-poll-shows-a-majority-of-black-marylanders-support-marriage-equality/ http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2012/05/movement-among-black-north-carolinians-on-gay-marriage.html http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2012/05/pa-blacks-shift-quickly-in-favor-of-gay-marriage.html
Is it liable to say that this dramatic change among them happened only because a black person (a.k.a. obama) started supporting this amendment, and therefore rendering all this people who changed their mind as racists who will change their positions just because of a persons skin color?
Now for the final part of this article, ill bring a few nice moments where chris Matthews gets confronted about his outrageous racism allegations.
Here's Herman Cain on fox and friends rebutting some stupid Matthews racism stuff
But this is the most enjoyable clip I've seen in a long time.
Newt Gingrich is giving it for chris Matthews straight in his face, turning the table and accusing him of racism. Check it out and enjoy. http://nation.foxnews.com/newt-gingrich/2012/08/27/gingrich-and-matthews-go-head-head-welfare-reform
My Final results are: MSNBC=racists.

[edit]

No comments:

Post a Comment